Search: Get past English with Solr

Implementing a great search feature for an English website is already quite a task. When you add accented characters like you have in French, things tend to get messy. What about more exotic languages like Japanese and Chinese?

When we tried to implement a search engine for a multi lingual website where we had articles in Chinese, Japanese and Korean, despite not knowing those languages at all, we quickly remarked that our search engine was performing really poorly. On some occasion it wasn’t even returning an article we specifically copied a word from.

We had to do a lot of research to understand what was happening, here is a compilation of what we found along the way in the hope you won’t have to go the same path as us!

Since our project is using Solr, this post will concentrate on how to use the described techniques with it. The version used is Solr 4.5 but this should work on newer version and most of them will also work on Solr 3 with only minor adaptation.

At first, returning results to a search query can be seen as easy, but pretty soon you realize that everyone has a different way of expressing things. You can also encounter spelling mistakes, usage of synonyms, use of conjugated verbs, etc.

Fortunately, a lot of intelligent people have already resolved those common issues, they’re often just a few keystrokes away.

Stop words

A stop word is a work too common in the language to bring any meaningful addition to the search. In English examples are “the”, “that”, “and”, “or”.

Those words usually appears in every texts and thus are not helping at all when searching. You can easily find databases of stop words for various languages on the Internet. Solr ships its own lists.

Usually you apply stop words both in the indexation and query processing. You can easily do that with Solr by adding a filter to your analyzers:

Depending on the particular field treated in your articles, you might want to add stop words specific to your dataset.


Not everyone use the same words to describe the same things, this is great for poetry, but it is the bane of search engines. Luckily, like for stop words, you can find ready to use synonyms list on the Internet and it is as easy to use them with Solr:

Contrary to stop words filtering however, usually you use synonyms filters only on the query to avoid cluttering your indexation space.

I also encourage you to extends your synonyms database with words that could be specific to your field.

Spelling mistakes

You could use synonyms filtering to catch common spelling mistakes, but it would quickly become cumbersome to have a complete list of errors that way. Most of modern search  engine integrates spelling mistakes correction in their core.

Solr also has a nifty feature that operate exactly like do “Did you mean” proposition you can sometimes see on the Google search page. It uses some rules and the document corpus to propose other query to your user.

Describing how to implement this with Solr is out of scope, but you can find documentation in the official wiki:


Words can be used in their singular or plural forms and verbs can be conjugated. This makes the job of the search engine really difficult. For example, if your user is looking for
“How to cut a diamond” you probably want to propose him the article “Diamond cutting”.

The words “How”, “to” and “a” will already be considered has stop words, so no problems here, however, you want to have a match for “cutting”. This is where stemming comes into

Stemming is the action of keeping only the relevant parts of each word (the stem), in this case it means that in most scenarios “cutting” and “cut” can be considered as identical. In French, you would consider “coupure”, “coupe”, “coupez” and “couper” as identical also.

Stemming is often activated on both indexation and query analysis. There is multiple stemming filters in Solr some more aggressive than others, usually the SnowballPorterFilterFactory is used for English:

But it may be too aggressive for other languages, this is why specific stemmers exists:
GermanLightStemFilterFactory, FrenchLightStemFilterFactory, JapaneseKatakanaStemFilterFactory, …

Phonetic matching

In some cases, for example when searching proper nouns, people will write something that is phonetically close but does not have the same spelling. There is a wide range of
algorithms that can be used in this case.

There is a dedicated documentation available: Solr Phonetic Matching

ASCII Folding

In some cases, for example when you want to sort results or with proper nouns, you want to get rid of all the accented letters and none ASCII characters.

Solr a a filter just for that:

This will transform “Björn Ångström” to “Bjorn Angstrom”, allowing to sort results without issues.

If you want a more consistent folding across all the Unicode planes, you can use the ICUFoldingFilterFactory.

It is however not recommended to use those filters on the fields used for searching because it could break other filters like stemming and will probably lead to less precise results.

Working with ideograms

Once you leave the known ground of the latin alphabet and its related languages, things start to get more complicated. There is a lot of differences between the way we commonly approach search and text comprehension that no longer holds.

As a disclaimer, I am no Japanese, Chinese or Korean speaker, so anything I say concerning those languages is to be taken with a grain of salt, it is only what I could comprehend of all my readings on the subject. If you can have access to someone knowledgeable about those, I can only advise you to speak with them to better your configuration even further.

The first difficulty we stumbled upon is that there are not really words you can base your search upon. There are no spaces in the sentences, only a chain of ideograms. Usually, search engines separate sentences in words in order to apply the various techniques we saw earlier, this is not possible with ideograms based languages.

The usual solution to this issue is to use n-grams.


A n-gram is a sequence of n items, in our case ideograms, from a text. Let’s make this clear using an example. Say we have the sentence “To be or not to be.” and we want to create n-gram of words from it, the result will be:

  • 2-gram or bigram: “to be”, “be or”, “or not”, “not to”, “to be”.
  • 3-gram or trigram: “to be or”, “be or not”, “or not to”, “not to be”.

Now apply this transformation not to words but ideograms and you can start using a search engine like Solr to search your articles.

There is a generic filter in Solr to create n-grams:

But in our case, Solr has a special tokenizer for CJK (Chinese, Japanese, Korean) languages:

If you use this tokenizer, Solr will automatically creates bigrams without the use of a specific filter for that.

Once you either applied the filter or the tokenizer to generate “words”, you can now apply the other techniques seen above to improve your search results.

It is important to note that n-gramming generates many terms per document and thus greatly increase the size of the index, impacting the performances. Sadly, as far as we found out, there’s no real other alternatives for Chinese and Korean. Japanese documents can however be treated using morphological analysis.

Morphological analysis

Since a sentence in Japanese may use up to 4 different alphabets, simple n-gramming often changes meaning and semantics. You can see the “Japanese Linguistics in Lucene and Solr” presentation for more details about those issues. Fortunately, Solr integrates a morphological analyzer for Japanese: Kuromoji.

Morphological analysis tries to separate Japanese in “words” that are meaningful for each sentence. It uses a statistical model to do so and thus there could be errors, but in any case the result won’t be worst than simple n-gramming.

Kuromoji is shipped as a tokenizer and a serie of filters, so you can use it as you would any other Solr feature we saw earlier:

Language specific text types

We just described some of the techniques that can be used to improve search results. Some of them you can use only with specific languages, others can be applied to all of them. There is also a lot of tuning that can be done based on each language specificity.

Luckily enough, a lot of people from around the world took the time to create specific Solr fields for some of the most used languages. Those are tailored to cather to each language peculiarities in the best way possible.

You can found those fields in the Solr example schema. I highly recommend that you first check there is there is an already existing field for the language you have to index and start from that.

The example schema is pretty big but also a well of best practices and knowledge when it comes to Solr, use it as much as possible. I promise you will gain a lot of time.


We just brushed the surface on what it is possible to do with Solr and we haven’t even started to talk about fine tuning.

Most of the filters presented in this post have parameters that you can tweak to ensure great results for your users. It is also really important to not underestimate what a good  knowledge of the specific business vocabulary can do if used to craft synonyms and stop words lists.

To go further, I can recommend you to start with the dedicated page of the Solr documentation about analyzing specific languages which should be up to date with the last techniques you can use for a whole list of languages: Solr Language Analysis.

In particular, have a look on the Language-Specific Factories part which list all the filters and tokenizer that are specific for each languages.

As a parting note, the order of filters can greatly impact performances and results. Usually you put filters removing words first (stop words filters for example), then normalizing ones and finally stemming. You can also apply some filters only at query time, like explained in the “Synonyms” part.

I hope this post can help you provide great search results to your customer and if you have any advice and techniques that you would like to share, please leave a comment!

Great post, indeed, multilingual search with Solr/ES/Lucene is one hell of a problem to solve, several approaches do work, having fields specialized in each language is one approach as long as each document is written entirely in one language. Other approaches are to keep a core for each language, or even a single field with all the languages annotated using payloads.

Processes like tokenization are also particularly difficult with CJK languages.

Thanks Gilles Crettenand for this article you well explained. I am fan of searching technology solr is one of them :) can you elaborate multilingual search with Solr

Leave a Reply